Power to Bias? The Effect of Attorney Empowerment in Voir Dire on Jury Prejudice and Race∗†
نویسندگان
چکیده
Giving attorneys more power in the voir dire (jury selection) process may allow them to 1) more easily dismiss jurors whom they wish to strike on a priori grounds; 2) acquire information that enables them to identify favorably-inclined jurors more precisely; or both. Attorneys who are more skilled can better leverage their increased power to retain the jurors they prefer. We show theoretically that, since defense attorneys tend to prefer non-white jurors a priori, the interaction of empowerment and defense attorney skill should produce juries with a greater proportion of non-whites if only the first mechanism is operative, but need not have this effect if the second is operative. We find empirically that skilled and empowered attorneys can indeed stack juries by retaining jurors predisposed to their side at a greater rate. However, we find that empowerment and skill have small and insignificant impacts on the racial composition of the seated jury. In the context of our model, this result implies that, for at least some of the trials in our dataset, attorneys leveraged empowerment in voir dire to learn more about potential jurors, rather than simply to strike more effectively by relying on racial stereotypes. Our findings provide strong evidence that extensive voir dire involving attorneys can lead to the seating of biased juries when opposing counsels are unequally skilled, yet the presence of this bias may not be detected in the observable characteristics of seated juries. We are grateful to Kevin Lang, Claudia Olivetti, Michael Manove, Aimee Chin, Chinhui Juhn, Andy Zuppann, Elaine Liu, Steven Craig, Richard Boylan, Randy Ellis, and Johannes Schmieder for excellent advice and guidance. Special thanks to Daniele Paserman, Wesley Yin, John Harris, Marc Rysman, and David Rossman for their helpful comments. Thanks to all of our colleagues who have given generously of their time and advice. The views presented are those of the authors and do not reflect those of Analysis Group. Any errors are our own. Updated drafts of this paper can be downloaded from http://www.uh.edu/~jlehman2 Corresponding author. Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, University of Houston. E-mail: jlehmann@uh. edu 211B McElhinney Hall, Houston, TX 77204-5019. The author is an Associate at Analysis Group, Inc., 111 Huntington Avenue, Tenth Floor, Boston, MA 02199. Research for this paper was undertaken when he was a PhD student at Boston University.
منابع مشابه
Voir Dire Efficacy In Highly Publicized Criminal Cases
VOIR DIRE EFFICACY IN HIGHLY PUBLICIZED CRIMINAL CASES by DAVID M.ZIMMERMAN Adviser: Margaret Bull Kovera Whether judges and attorneys are able to detect bias among potential jurors (venirepersons) is a pivotal concern in highly publicized cases in which most of the jury pool has been exposed to pretrial publicity (PTP). The current dissertation research addressed 1) whether attorneys and judge...
متن کاملUNRAVELING THE GORDIAN KNOT OF IMPLICIT BIAS IN JURY SELECTION: THE PROBLEMS OF JUDGE-DOMINATED VOIR DIRE, THE FAILED PROMISE OF BATSON, AND PROPOSED SOLUTIONS Judge
Republished with permission of the President and Fellows of Harvard College, from Judge Mark W. Bennett, Unraveling the Gordian Knot of Implicit Bias in Jury Selection: The Problems of Judge-Dominated Voir Dire, the Failed Promise of Batson, and Proposed Solutions, 4 HAR. L. & POL’Y REV 149 (2010); permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. The article was reprinted from Westl...
متن کاملStacking the Jury: Legal Professionals' Peremptory Challenges Reflect Jurors' Levels of Implicit Race Bias.
Most legal systems are based on the premise that defendants are treated as innocent until proven guilty and that decisions will be unbiased and solely based on the facts of the case. The validity of this assumption has been questioned for cases involving racial minority members, in that racial bias among jury members may influence jury decisions. The current research shows that legal profession...
متن کاملUncovering Bias: Toward a More Effective Voir Dire
Judge Mark W. Bennett of the Northern District of Iowa calls himself a “true believer” of implicit bias, having instructed jurors on this subject for more than 8 years from the bench. He has developed a set of jury instructions to educate jurors on the existence of their biases and holds them accountable by signing their name consenting to be fair during trial. To emphasize the importance of th...
متن کاملAnger in the Courtroom: The Effects of Attorney Gender and Emotion on Juror Perceptions
This study sought to examine the effects of gender stereotypes of emotional expression on jurors’ perceptions of an attorney’s competence. Participants watched a video of a closing statement of a male or female attorney expressing either anger or neutral emotions and were asked to give a verdict and rate the attorney’s competence. Participants rated an angry male attorney highest in competence ...
متن کامل